compare graphics cards with geforce gtx 650

The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). Although its graphics frequency is lower, the GeForce GTX 650 Ti card comes with twice as many TMUs, which results in substantially higher texture fill rate. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the clock speed of the card. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). This is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. Difference: 10592 (63) Please note that the above benchmarks are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the cards specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. If it uses DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. It's worked out by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface within a second.

Compare graphics cards with geforce gtx 650